tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7688168599091858865.post2575741170489044052..comments2019-11-20T01:30:41.452-05:00Comments on Vadim's WebBlog: TypeMock too powerful to useVadimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08860101382423992453noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7688168599091858865.post-14952875591467705762007-05-05T18:16:00.000-04:002007-05-05T18:16:00.000-04:00Interesting.I haven't use Rhino.Mocks for a while ...Interesting.<BR/><BR/>I haven't use Rhino.Mocks for a while but from what I can remember it could mock delegates, interfaces and virtual methods. I thus found I was either making all the methods virtual or was introducing interfaces, even though those interfaces were pretty much useless for anything other than testing.<BR/><BR/>In fact I found designing for testability can actually cause me to write slightly poor code, but I guess it depends on the situation.Colin Jackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01403166737046938219noreply@blogger.com